Related Articles
Unless you’re running around barefoot, you experience heat waves through air temperature. For the most part, that’s how scientists track them too. “Heat extremes have been always studied based on air temperature, in part because we have a lot of observations of air temperatures,” such as from meteorological stations, says Almudena García-García, an Earth system scientist at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research.
But how heat waves are rippling through the ground is much less studied. This proliferation of heat could have major implications for the intricate natural systems that grow our food, process water, and even sequester carbon. At a certain point, warming soils could actually contribute to higher air temperatures, in a gnarly sort of climatic feedback loop.
Late last month, García-García published troubling findings in the journal Nature Climate Change about soil heat extremes across Central Europe. The team gathered data from 1996 to 2021 on air temperatures up to 2 meters (about 6 feet) off the ground, and temperatures in the same regions in the first 10 centimeters (or 4 inches) of soil. At two-thirds of the nearly 120 measuring stations they tapped into, heat extremes were growing more pronounced in the soil than in the air. Each decade, these extremes grew 0.7 degrees Celsius higher in the soil compared to the air. The number of days the soil experienced heat extremes increased twice as fast.
“This paper opens a lot of questions, because now we see that there are differences between the evolution of soil and air heat extremes,” says García-García. “Perhaps the difference between the evolution of heat events in soil, vegetation, and air can help us to understand or to predict agricultural failures, biodiversity changes, or any other climate-change impact on ecosystem activities.”
The tricky thing about soil is that no two patches of it in the world are alike. One area might have a higher clay or sand content. Another might have more carbon from plants. One spot might be darker than another, and absorb more of the sun’s energy. In some places, like an Amazonian rainforest, trees might block almost all sunlight from hitting the earth. But on a grassland, the sparse vegetation might let more photons in. In the far north or south, the sun angles differently across the landscape than it does at the equator. Topology varies greatly, from perfectly flat to mountainous. A water table might be higher in one place and lower in another. Different microbial communities teem in different soils, as do different invertebrates like earthworms and insects. Whew. All of these variables combine to determine how soil will heat when the sun rises over the local horizon.
Farmers have always worried about soil temperature—if they don’t plant their crops at the right time, the seeds won’t germinate. “The old farmer adage out here is that if you can put your bare bottom on the soil and hold it for like 15 seconds comfortably, it's warm enough to plant,” says soil scientist Andrew Margenot of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, who wasn’t involved in the new paper. “It's now used as a joke, but people figured things out when they didn't have these fancy tools.”
Most PopularGearThe Top New Features Coming to Apple’s iOS 18 and iPadOS 18By Julian ChokkattuCultureConfessions of a Hinge Power UserBy Jason ParhamGearHow Do You Solve a Problem Like Polestar?By Carlton ReidSecurityWhat You Need to Know About Grok AI and Your PrivacyBy Kate O'Flaherty
Today, those tools include sensor networks that have grown as the prices of instruments for measuring temperature and moisture have cratered, and improved modeling. If you know the soil properties, recent precipitation figures, and ambient air temperature in a given area, you can work out with reasonable accuracy how that soil might heat.
While farmers have always demanded this data, scientists increasingly want it to divine how soil temperatures might be changing with global warming. A major concern is hydrology: As soil heats, it releases its accumulated rainwater as vapor and cools the landscape. But soil only has so much water to give up. Once it’s dry, it absorbs heat and begins releasing it to the air, much like concrete does in a city. “If on really hot days the soil is very dry, then this energy is used to warm the soil instead of evaporating the water,” says García-García. “That was our explanation of why we are seeing these fast increases of soil heat extremes.”
This feedback loop powers the heat domes that have been settling over the United States: Warm air descends on the landscape, drawing moisture from the soil and raising temperatures. These fiercely hot self-perpetuating monsters can continue for weeks.
It’s even worse if there’s little water in the soil to begin with. “Another very important and also interesting perspective is compound events, so the combination of the heat waves and droughts,” says Jian Peng, an Earth observation scientist at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research and coauthor of the new paper.
Both heat waves and droughts, of course, are getting worse with climate change. “Our climate models essentially predict that this contribution of low moisture of dry soils to heat extremes is only going to increase or strengthen in the future,” says ETH Zurich atmospheric scientist Dominik Schumacher, who studies the interaction between land and air but wasn’t involved in the new paper. “I think that the paper makes it a bit more clear that what happens in the ground— even though we don't see it—definitely does matter.”
As the climate changes, so will the soils themselves, in all kinds of ways—organically, hydrologically, microbially. “Soils are in equilibrium, more or less,” says Margenot. “The non-pessimistic view is: Well, this is going to shift to new equilibrium. The problem is that we humans depend on soils for multiple services, like water storage and food production. Those might get caught up or disrupted in that new shift.”
Take the carbon cycle, for instance. Plants absorb carbon dioxide as they grow, adding it to the soil for microbes to process and release back to the atmosphere. That keeps the system in balance. But if higher soil temperatures cause the plants to suffer, they won’t grow as much and won’t capture as much carbon. Now the soil will lose more carbon than it takes in. “‘Disruptive’ this and that is a good thing in the tech world,” says Margenot. “I don't know if that's a good thing for agriculture or soils.”
Most PopularGearThe Top New Features Coming to Apple’s iOS 18 and iPadOS 18By Julian ChokkattuCultureConfessions of a Hinge Power UserBy Jason ParhamGearHow Do You Solve a Problem Like Polestar?By Carlton ReidSecurityWhat You Need to Know About Grok AI and Your PrivacyBy Kate O'Flaherty
Dry, hot conditions combined with soil that lacks organic matter also leads to erosion and dust emissions. (That’s what happened in the Dust Bowl.) Less agricultural growth also means less food is available for people.
Soil microbial communities will change, too—the galaxy of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and archaea in the ground. “Most of the diversity of fungi on the planet is in soil,” says soil microbial ecologist Kate Scow of UC Davis, who wasn’t involved in the new research. “Are any of these temperatures at the drop-dead temperature? Probably not. We're not talking about that yet. But you'll get changes in the diversity of the community.”
Some microbes might struggle with warming temperatures and decreasing soil moisture, so their numbers will fall. Others might grow more numerous. That will in turn influence the functions of those species. Some process carbon or phosphorus; others turn nitrogen into fertilizer for plants. Still others—the mycorrhizal fungi—form symbiotic relationships with plants, helping the roots take up water and nutrients in exchange for nutrients of their own.
Soil heat waves could become a kind of repetitive stress on these underground communities. “I wonder if over time,” says Scow, “if soils are increasingly hit again and again and again with high temperatures and big droughts, is it going to ratchet down the capacity for them to deal with future events?”
